Sustainable art facing the need for regeneration, responsibility and relations

The terms "sustainability" and "sustainable development" frequently appear in discussions around politics, economics, and ecology, underscoring a growing recognition of our planet's global responsibility. Historically, we've leaned more towards unchecked exploitation, but now there's an imperative shift towards stewardship. This paradigm change is especially evident in the realm of sustainable art, which embodies a strong element of social activism.

When one delves into the realm of sustainable art, it becomes apparent that it transcends traditional aesthetic criteria. Instead, it encompasses a wide range of themes such as ecological awareness, recycling, energy dynamics, an emotional connection to history, and political change in the wake of colonialist oppression. These diverse themes foster the development of innovative artistic practices that challenge conventional boundaries.

Sustainable art emerges as a response to the symbolic violence of modernism, characterized by its rigid demarcations and glorification of the solitary genius. Modernist values had established hierarchies endorsing the removal of anything deemed inferior, outdated, or irrational. This rejection of superfluous discrimination makes sustainable art a powerful counter-narrative.

The essence of sustainable art lies in promoting care, responsibility, and harmony. It champions empathy, urging us to appreciate the unfamiliar and the enigmatic. In today's art scene, the shift from celebrating the solitary genius to embracing community and collaboration reflects a broader commitment to inclusivity. The pressing question remains: is sustainable art an idealistic pursuit, a prestigious venture, or perhaps an indispensable evolution?